Educating the Dragon






         A learning journey with no fixed abode

July 14, 2007

AtoL Expo

Filed under: AtoL07, Dragon09, Education, classroom management, teaching, writing — Dragon09 @ 1:46 pm

AtoL conference title

AtoL Expo 07, arranged by Massey University was packed out today with teachers from around the country. It was hosted at Havelock North Intermediate School with two excellent keynote addresses, the first from John Hattie from Auckland University and the second Erika Ross, Manager of the Literacy, Numeracy and Assessment team in the Ministry of Education in
Wellington. More about them in another post or two.

 What I would like to talk about now is Regan Orr, from Russell St. He talked about students creating their own criteria/ matrix. When I read it I thought ‘oh, he means success criteria from the Learning Objectives’, but it blew me away when he actually meant what he had written. He talked us through how his Y5/6 class spent the whole term on ‘Procedural writing’ but for the first two weeks they did no writing at all. But talked and discussed what a procedure was, what were features of a good procedure? He pulled out of School Journals a variety of examples and the students highlighted different parts of them a discussed what each feature was. From there they looked at what an ‘expert’ would create as a procedure, then what a ‘novice would be doing than then the ‘practitioner’ in the middle. The students, over the first three weeks had created (with some scaffolding and support) their own matrix for procedure writing. From there they each got a copy and for each of their own procedures highlighted on their copy of the matrix where they thought that piece of writing fitted. Genius.  

My class are doing Explanation writing this term. Hope he stay in touch, I want to do this thing the best that I can.

July 12, 2007

ULearn here I come

Filed under: Dragon09, ICT, Interwrite, ULearn07 — Dragon09 @ 11:00 pm

I’ll be there too. Hopefully recording for Edcast, so if you’ve got a presentation you don’t having recorded please leave a comment. Sorry I can’t record Ewan et al (contractual complications I’m told- so sad!) I’ll also be presenting Skypetalkandwrite, so whatch out for that too. Looking forward to catching up with Virtual Friends like Louise and Allanah and Jane

 See you there!

PD- Sizes and styles

Filed under: Dragon09, Flaxmere, My Education, communication — Dragon09 @ 1:49 pm

I am very fortunate to have  a great PD group. Yesterday I worked over at Taradale Intermediate
School with Chrissy and Jenny. We spent the morning just catching up and then working on my PRS presentation together. Chrissy is a great buddy and we work well together, bouncing ideas off one another, sharing experiences and generally having such a laugh. I have to say being able to have fun together during PD sessions just lightens the atmosphere, fires the brain and lets the ideas flow.
I have to also say that Jenny and I had a fantastic lunch together, Chrissy was their in body but her mind and spirit were stretching out across the Internet to the WOW chat site.

Today I am in the Flaxmere ICTPD session with 20 ish in attendance. We’re talking about Web2.0 tools this morning and E portfolios this afternoon. But I want to spend a couple of minutes talking about group dynamics. With the session yesterday, with three of us who have been working with each other for a couple of years, the atmosphere, respect and free flow of ideas is huge. Now I am in a larger group with folk from a variety of schools, who have been working together for only 6 months I have noticed the presentation style that Jenny adopts is much more formal and the flow of ideas not so free flowing. Interesting?  

What I am interested in is if you are part of the Flaxmere ICTPD what is your take on how the PD is going?

If your not, what models for PD delivery have you encountered, what worked or is working best?

July 11, 2007

Digital Natives? Digital Immigrants?

Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants by Marc Prensky has to be one of the most commented on concepts in recent times. I have a few issues I wish to rise regarding this piece of writing, particularly in light of how it is being used throughout the world today. Marc Prensky

 

Our students have changed radically. Today’s students are no longer the people our educational system was designed to teach.

 Marc begins with this statement, but is it true? Have our students really changed that significantly? What is Marc basing that statement on, there is no reference to research carried out or other reading he has gleaned that piece of information from.

 

Today’s students – K through college – represent the first generations to grow up with this new technology. They have spent their entire lives surrounded by and using computers, videogames, digital music players, video cams, cell phones, and all the other toys and tools of the digital age.  

What a sweeping generalisation, who are they, and by ‘they’  is it really all of them, most of them, those that ‘matter’, who matters anyway, how do you measure that? So many questions.

 

Today’s average college grads have spent less than 5,000 hours of their lives reading, but over 10,000 hours playing video games (not to mention 20,000 hours watching TV).

 Where have these figure come from? Is a simple question of multiplying up from hours in the day, who is this based on?

 

Says Dr. Bruce D. Berry of

Baylor
College of Medicine.
 

Who is Doctor Bruce? What is he a doctor of? What research is he basing his statement on? I quick Google search for the man in question simply refers to Marc’s other work. It was written six years ago, I guess we’ve all moved on since then.

 

On page 2 of  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Marc talks about digital language and how us ‘immigrants’ have to learn ‘digital’ like a second language…. And a language learned later in life, scientists tell us, goes into a different part of the brain. Does it? What scientists? Is learning to work an ipod really the same as learning a second language? Perhaps Marc is taking his analogue a little too far?

 

 Digital Immigrants don’t believe their students can learn successfully while watching TV or listening to music, because they (the Immigrants) can’t.  

Is this statement really true? I know the second part is (for me anyway) but that doesn’t mean the first part is. Where’s the study to back up this claim?

 

My own preference for teaching Digital Natives is to invent computer games to do the job, even for the most serious content.  

It is good to here Marc talk about his own preferences and what an innovative way of going about teaching. Good on you Marc, My issue, rather is the way his statement has been taken by companies, educators and motivational speakers to turn the realm of education into one big game.

 

Does this mean that we can ignore Marc’s work? That is simply an interesting picture and can be dismissed out of hand? I would suggest the answer is still NO.

 

Firstly, if you sat there nodding while you read thinking, either “yep, that’s my son/ daughter” or “those are my clueless teachers he’s talking about.” then that has some merit, and it gains more weight if lots of folks around the globe are nodding away with you and me.

 

Secondly, since its publication  the title of the book has:

 24,000 hits on Google 251 blog posts about “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants” on Technoratithe most recent on my writing this being 13 hours ago. That is 6 years after its publication. 

Finally, when read in the contexts of books such as Growing Up digital by Don Tapscott or The World is Flat by Thomas Friedman it is given some weight, reflected, as it were from these publications. 

Is it a scholarly work? Probably not. Is it a well written opinion piece? Perhaps. Does it serve as a wake up call for academia and governments to take a serious look at education? Most definitely.

July 8, 2007

School 2.0 + Ethics 2.0 = Society 2.0

Martin Sheen plays the President in West Wing

“To be a good man you must act like a good man.” Aristotle

“Together, the church, business, and political dissolution is in far greater crisis than many realize. We are suffering from serious moral decay.” Frinser

What does it say about ‘western’ society that our best moral leaders are fictitious?

I have spent this first week of holidays thinking about ethics. We in the
United States satellite nations also have our morality served up in witty comebacks and clever dialogue. And it is a crying shame that Ethical Leadership is modelled to us through ‘the Tube’ rather than the leadership qualities and values personified in our national and business leaders.

What Dr Finser talks about in his book ‘In search of Ethical Leadership’ is not to give Bush, Kenneth Lay of  Enron or United Way a grilling, though he does that a bit; its more looking ahead and answering the question: How are we going to grow ethical leaders for the future?

But these individuals are not solely to blame; for society, its media, advertisements, peer pressure etc strongly influences the quality of the leaders that emerge.

So what are the qualities of an Ethical Leader?

I came across this:

Twelve Terms – Guiding Principals* Responsibility
* Contemplation
* Initiative
* Perseverance
* Optimum
* Courage
* Respect
* Compassion
* Adaptability
* Honesty
* Trustworthiness
* Loyalty

from Dr. Willard Daggett Cliotech notes

Not that it’s a definitive list but a great place to start.

Finser shies away from a ‘definitive’ list, opting to highlight some specific characteristics;

Humility is the beginning of solving the leadership challenge.” Finser

Humility in the sense of directing team members, letting others take initiative, being available for consultation, feedback and refocus. Much of this is covered in “The One Minute Manager” but will forever hold true.

Accountability is a key word for leaders, for without accountability there is no anchor for the visionary and no rocket for the slacker.

So how do we instil some of these worthy qualities in our children and youth?  

Finser identifies a key issue with the educational system when ‘kids’ go off to college. He talks about the ‘good life’ that at this impressionable stage all boundaries are removed as the 18 year old goes off to college. The college campus with its lax timetable, constant parties, late mornings, later nights do our young people no good in developing their sense of priority and establishing positive work habit as well as other qualities identified in Dr Willard Daggett’s list.

 Many colleges are more interested in the bottom line than developing strong ethical leaders, encouraging as many youngsters to their campus, increase tuition fees so much as to make thinking of your kids college years, and saving for them a life long goal…. I know my wife and I are beginning to think of such things and my boy is not even 2!

Finser highlights the importance of reading, writing, walking, sketching, making music and generally being given a chance to pause and reflect. “Spoiling our youth with Club Med college experiences leads to disappointment when real jobs do not support such a wonderful lifestyle. For some, such disappointment can develop into an overwhelming desire for ‘the good things’, no matter what the cost.” Finser sights Community service, work-study, and a balanced life in college as preventatives to Enronitis.  Oxford University Memorymap

So what about our kids, what needs to be happening in the primary/elementary school to foster these qualities which will develop sound moral judgement? 

Art, that’s the answer to it all, Art. Through art grows the ability for creative thinking. And creative thinking is the basis of a free democratic society.

Children deserve aesthetically pleasing environments; Clean, respected grounds, colourful, enlivened, spacious walls, lightened, airy classrooms.

With our concrete floors, concrete walls and flat ceilings schools are hardly the places for encouraging, free, creative thought. When you visit a Greek temple as the author, Finser did or stand in the esplanades of Oxford, Cambridge or presumably Harvard and Yale (though I’ve never seem them) and look up, you have space above your head, almost making a connection with a higher being for a higher purpose. Next time you step into your school or classroom, look up, do you make that connection, can your students?

« Previous PageNext Page »

Hosted by Edublogs.